🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial policy to restrict social networking access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves internationally. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and families are observing with great interest to see if this approach will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

European Movement

Throughout Europe, a rising chorus of countries are considering similar measures.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader arguing that mobile devices and platforms are "robbing our children's childhood". The policy could be passed soon.
• Norway is set to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to protect young people from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to authenticate the age and identity of social media account holders. Officials have stated that an similar ban is "one of the options under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on parliament to enact a proposal lifting the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has suggested a related move, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Dutch government has advised guardians to restrict their kids from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has approved a advisory motion demanding a ban for under-16s except if parental consent is provided. Although it warns of the "addictive" design of these apps, the resolution does not create mandatory rules.

"A clear age limit is a useful foundation," stated the parliamentarian supporting the initiative.

The UK: A Cautious Approach

Across Britain, the leadership has kept open a future ban, arguing that "nothing is discarded" but maintaining any policy must be "based on conclusive data".

Earlier, interest gathered behind a proposal to impose restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately weakened. However, the administration committed to conduct more studies the issue.

Campaign organizations have voiced warnings. A prominent charity set up by the loved ones of a young person who died after encountering dangerous online content argues that a blanket age ban might not make platforms safer and could create a "dangerous transition" of harm when young people reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the refusal of the tech sector to create products and services that are safe and age appropriate for young users," commented a leading child protection advocate.

The United States: A Decentralized Approach

Across America, regulation is largely occurring at the local level against a backdrop of national gridlock.

• Utah demands parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a law prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a law limiting minors to one hour of social media access per day, with extra access requiring adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also introduced bills mandating guardian approval for teenagers to open social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from various individuals to mimic this lead, a federal ban is currently seen as unlikely.

International Outlook

Apart from these regions, further countries are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for teenagers effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the required age for Instagram to 16.

But, world agencies adopt a more measured position. The UN children's agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "might have unintended consequences". The agency points out that social networks can be a "lifeline" for isolated youth and that bans should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to invest in child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide discussion evolves, the policies of the Australian government and its followers show that policymakers globally are no longer willing to wait for platforms to act voluntarily.